"On April 25 in Italy is Liberation Day, please note that the anniversary of liberation from fascism. During the Second World War (1939-1945), after 1943, Italy found itself divided in two: the north Benito Mussolini and the Fascists had formed the Italian Social Republic, close to the Germans and the Nazis of Hitler, while the south is formed in opposition to the Badoglio government, in cooperation with the American and British Allies. To combat the Nazi-Fascist rule was organized resistance, formed by the Partisans. These were men, women, youth, elders, priests, soldiers, people from different walks of life, different political and religious ideas, but they had in common the will to fight personally, each with its own means to achieve democracy at home and respect for individual freedom and equality. On 25 April 1945, the partisans, backed by the Allies, came victorious in major Italian cities, putting an end to the tragic period of grief and ruins, and thereby starting the process of liberation of Italy from the oppression fascista.Qualche years later, the ideas of democracy and freedom, was born the Italian Constitution. "
This is written in history books, the same people who often are challenged by new assessments that it is customary to define revisionism. Any assessment of historical and political events of the day we want to give, the best way to prevent the sacrosanct objectivity to be affected by the alteration of historical facts is to stick to the concrete acts of politicians and government in place with laws and decrees as well as nell'andazzo squad. Then that this was the result of aberration of an idea and a policy that did not include in its germ, at least at the beginning, all the actions that followed and which led to the transformation into a dictatorship of the fascist movement itself, could justify a revisionist intentions, not the revisionism of the meaning of the concrete actions that were consumed. After the murder of Matteotti
the fascist movement, flourished in the population as a desire to redeem the cultural and political role that the Italian nation could claim as a function of its history, had to have a dramatic and decisive turn towards dictatorship. The cultures
action which vest in the fascist squads were given an attractive devotion to violence and coercion, unleashed almost spontaneously in the most sensitive all'infatuazione collective minds.
Playing strengthened national consciousness and unity was finally emanate from a pride of the people never germinated, but only planted in the one at home encouraged by the First World War. Mussolini escaped to the farmer a bit 'too carried away during the sowing and found himself, perhaps despite himself, to assume all responsibility for this turn toward the fascist movement suffered a fascist dictatorship. The precise moment was
Mussolini's speech in parliament after the murder of Matteotti, January 3, 1925: ".. I assume, I just, political responsibility, morality, history of all that is avvenuto.Se phrases more or less crippled enough to hang a man, outside the pole and off the rope! If fascism was not to bludgeon and castor oil, and not a proud passion of the best Italian youth, to blame me! If fascism was a criminal, I am the leader of this conspiracy! If all the violence were the result of a specific historical climate, political and moral, well to me the responsibility for this, because this climate historical, political and moral I have created with a propaganda that goes by the intervention to date. "
From then on the fascist dictatorship was not afraid to come out and, as if they want to discuss and revise, were violated fundamental freedoms, to the shame of racial laws of 1938, undertaken to please the German ally and signed by the King of Italy without batting an eyelid.
could be mentioned in hundreds of thousands of episodes of everyday civilian life where you broke the highest human right to express themselves freely and peacefully, according to the spontaneous dignity.
Fascism was a dictatorship and the fact that it was almost the entire Italian people to be infatuated with for twenty years, not justified and not redeem the tragic political movement from the responsibilities ensuing civilian life first and then going to war.
resistance to the dictatorship matured in the last two years, from 1943 to 1945, when Italy was divided in two between the Republic of Salò, ordered by Hitler to restore the fortunes now adverse to the Nazi occupation and Italian Fascism, and the rest of the Italians fascist-backed allies.
On one side they were fighting to restore what fascism had become inevitable: the abolition of press freedom, violence on political dissent, suppression of political parties and associations of all kinds of other abuse European populations for national advantage, political and military subordination to psychosis Nazi imperialism grotesque and unrealistic, racial persecution and more.
the other is fighting to restore the fundamental human right: simply, the freedom!
episodes that were consumed were episodes of war, the victims were casualties of war. The horrors that were committed by both sides were equal, and also attributable to the madness that only knows war trigger.
But on the one hand there were those who had caused this war and the other who responded. And who reacted
laid the seeds of revival of the Italian nation to freedom. He wrote the basic principles of the Italian Constitution in which only a wicked man can not identify. Why are the fundamental principles of humanity, progress, development, culture, dignity, without which any people could not survive with dignity.
The denial of these principles has led and still leads to dictatorships.
Whoever does not like to put them into question and does not want a free people and self-determination.
Anyone who does not want to recognize that, in this nation, April 25, even with all the limitations of hand-partisan military, the Italian people has decided to take man's freedom against dictatorship, must be convinced that Italy is not the His ideal residence. Although, the same freedom of conscience won, will be able to express all the archaic absolutist claims that profess to be veiled in the name of a political dead issue in all developed Western countries and civilians who reject dictatorship, fascist or communist alike. The pity of the dead
no difference in the face! As no condemnation deserves the good faith of those who espoused the idea or he was captured surreptitiously on the basis of love of country. On
young people who were there because otherwise Salo shot for desertion, must be addressed to a particular human compassion.
about what we believed viscerally the same compassion, not to have understood that any large idea can have no value unless it presupposes the freedom of man, that policy is not conjecture but the greatest gift that God has given human instinct.
On all these vague pity, enthusiasm and recognition of the common good of the cause, the heirs of that experience dramatic can now meet together to strengthen the companies that channel the energies towards development, human dignity and those inalienable rights already violated only in underdeveloped societies. About
strongly condemns those who continue to dig up buried issues and defeated by history and human progress, does not remove the 'national reconciliation' of then opposing fronts, but more dutifully protect the inalienable rights, preventing new and dangerous backfiring, always there, whenever the company is coerced by the crisis of values \u200b\u200bin order to marry the superficiality of the myths that they know, unfortunately, recur in alternate history courses, under the guise of the benefit of the people. (Ap)
This is written in history books, the same people who often are challenged by new assessments that it is customary to define revisionism. Any assessment of historical and political events of the day we want to give, the best way to prevent the sacrosanct objectivity to be affected by the alteration of historical facts is to stick to the concrete acts of politicians and government in place with laws and decrees as well as nell'andazzo squad. Then that this was the result of aberration of an idea and a policy that did not include in its germ, at least at the beginning, all the actions that followed and which led to the transformation into a dictatorship of the fascist movement itself, could justify a revisionist intentions, not the revisionism of the meaning of the concrete actions that were consumed. After the murder of Matteotti
the fascist movement, flourished in the population as a desire to redeem the cultural and political role that the Italian nation could claim as a function of its history, had to have a dramatic and decisive turn towards dictatorship. The cultures
action which vest in the fascist squads were given an attractive devotion to violence and coercion, unleashed almost spontaneously in the most sensitive all'infatuazione collective minds.
Playing strengthened national consciousness and unity was finally emanate from a pride of the people never germinated, but only planted in the one at home encouraged by the First World War. Mussolini escaped to the farmer a bit 'too carried away during the sowing and found himself, perhaps despite himself, to assume all responsibility for this turn toward the fascist movement suffered a fascist dictatorship. The precise moment was
Mussolini's speech in parliament after the murder of Matteotti, January 3, 1925: ".. I assume, I just, political responsibility, morality, history of all that is avvenuto.Se phrases more or less crippled enough to hang a man, outside the pole and off the rope! If fascism was not to bludgeon and castor oil, and not a proud passion of the best Italian youth, to blame me! If fascism was a criminal, I am the leader of this conspiracy! If all the violence were the result of a specific historical climate, political and moral, well to me the responsibility for this, because this climate historical, political and moral I have created with a propaganda that goes by the intervention to date. "
From then on the fascist dictatorship was not afraid to come out and, as if they want to discuss and revise, were violated fundamental freedoms, to the shame of racial laws of 1938, undertaken to please the German ally and signed by the King of Italy without batting an eyelid.
could be mentioned in hundreds of thousands of episodes of everyday civilian life where you broke the highest human right to express themselves freely and peacefully, according to the spontaneous dignity.
Fascism was a dictatorship and the fact that it was almost the entire Italian people to be infatuated with for twenty years, not justified and not redeem the tragic political movement from the responsibilities ensuing civilian life first and then going to war.
resistance to the dictatorship matured in the last two years, from 1943 to 1945, when Italy was divided in two between the Republic of Salò, ordered by Hitler to restore the fortunes now adverse to the Nazi occupation and Italian Fascism, and the rest of the Italians fascist-backed allies.
On one side they were fighting to restore what fascism had become inevitable: the abolition of press freedom, violence on political dissent, suppression of political parties and associations of all kinds of other abuse European populations for national advantage, political and military subordination to psychosis Nazi imperialism grotesque and unrealistic, racial persecution and more.
the other is fighting to restore the fundamental human right: simply, the freedom!
episodes that were consumed were episodes of war, the victims were casualties of war. The horrors that were committed by both sides were equal, and also attributable to the madness that only knows war trigger.
But on the one hand there were those who had caused this war and the other who responded. And who reacted
laid the seeds of revival of the Italian nation to freedom. He wrote the basic principles of the Italian Constitution in which only a wicked man can not identify. Why are the fundamental principles of humanity, progress, development, culture, dignity, without which any people could not survive with dignity.
The denial of these principles has led and still leads to dictatorships.
Whoever does not like to put them into question and does not want a free people and self-determination.
Anyone who does not want to recognize that, in this nation, April 25, even with all the limitations of hand-partisan military, the Italian people has decided to take man's freedom against dictatorship, must be convinced that Italy is not the His ideal residence. Although, the same freedom of conscience won, will be able to express all the archaic absolutist claims that profess to be veiled in the name of a political dead issue in all developed Western countries and civilians who reject dictatorship, fascist or communist alike. The pity of the dead
no difference in the face! As no condemnation deserves the good faith of those who espoused the idea or he was captured surreptitiously on the basis of love of country. On
young people who were there because otherwise Salo shot for desertion, must be addressed to a particular human compassion.
about what we believed viscerally the same compassion, not to have understood that any large idea can have no value unless it presupposes the freedom of man, that policy is not conjecture but the greatest gift that God has given human instinct.
On all these vague pity, enthusiasm and recognition of the common good of the cause, the heirs of that experience dramatic can now meet together to strengthen the companies that channel the energies towards development, human dignity and those inalienable rights already violated only in underdeveloped societies. About
strongly condemns those who continue to dig up buried issues and defeated by history and human progress, does not remove the 'national reconciliation' of then opposing fronts, but more dutifully protect the inalienable rights, preventing new and dangerous backfiring, always there, whenever the company is coerced by the crisis of values \u200b\u200bin order to marry the superficiality of the myths that they know, unfortunately, recur in alternate history courses, under the guise of the benefit of the people. (Ap)
0 comments:
Post a Comment